Skip to Content
chalvien 1.0 is released
DocumentationSRS DocumentationSRS ProjectStarting Point

Starting point

Building from scratch an SRS that’s actually alive instead of a glorified Google Doc is exactly what our teams need. We’ll go a bit beyond the obvious and focus on features that change behavior, not just formatting.

1. Core idea shift (why it beats a shared doc)

A shared document is:

  • linear
  • passive
  • easy to ignore inconsistencies

Your app should be:

  • structured
  • validated
  • traceable
  • collaborative with guardrails

Think: SRS as a system, not a file.

2. Features that genuinely add value

2.1 Structured requirements (not free text)

Instead of one big markdown blob:

  • Atomic Requirement blocks
  • ID (REQ-001)
  • Type: Functional / Non-functional / Constraint
  • Priority (MoSCoW)
  • Status (Draft / Approved / Deprecated)
  • Rationale
  • Acceptance criteria (Gherkin-like)
  • Enforce structure, but allow rich text inside fields

Juniors learn how requirements are written, not just what they are.

Trend tie-in: “Docs as data”, schema-first documentation.

2.2 Requirement validation & linting

This is a big differentiator.

Examples:

  • Detect:
    • ambiguous words (“fast”, “user-friendly”, “should”)
    • missing acceptance criteria
    • requirements without priority
  • Warnings like ESLint, but for SRS

This turns the app into a teaching tool.

Modern angle: AI-assisted linting (not auto-writing, but reviewing).

2.3 Traceability matrix (auto-generated)

Classic SRS pain point.

Link:

  • Requirements → Use cases
  • Requirements → ERD entities
  • Requirements → API endpoints
  • Requirements → Test cases (future)

Auto-generate:

  • Traceability table
  • Or interactive graph view

Shared docs don’t do this without becoming a mess.

2.4 ERD as a first-class citizen

Schema loading.

Ideas:

  • Import Prisma schema → auto-generate ERD (Mermaid or custom)
  • Click entity → see related requirements
  • Highlight:
    • entities without requirements
    • requirements without data model impact

Juniors visually learn how requirements affect data design.

2.5 Living diagrams (Mermaid++)

Beyond static Mermaid blocks:

  • Parameterized Mermaid diagrams
  • Toggle layers:
    • conceptual ERD
    • logical ERD
  • Inline references:
    • clicking a diagram node opens related requirements

Trend: diagrams as interactive components, not screenshots.

2.6 Change impact analysis

This is huge.

When a requirement changes:

  • Show impacted:
    • ERD entities
    • other requirements
    • diagrams
  • Force a short “impact note” before saving

This mimics real-world engineering discipline.

2.7 Versioning that makes sense

Not just Git-style diffs.

  • Version SRS by milestones
  • Compare versions:
    • “What changed in requirements?”
    • “What entities were added?”
  • Rollback individual requirements, not whole doc

Trend: domain-level versioning instead of raw text diffs.

2.8 Review & approval workflow (lightweight)

For juniors, this is gold.

  • States: Draft → In Review → Approved
  • Inline comments on:
    • requirement fields
    • diagrams
  • Simple approval rules:
    • e.g. “2 approvals needed”

Teaches real SDLC flows early.

3. Smart exports (Markdown / PDF, but better)

3.1 Export profiles

  • “Academic SRS”
  • “Client-friendly”
  • “Internal dev”

Each profile:

  • includes/excludes sections
  • reorders content
  • changes wording density

Shared docs can’t do this cleanly.

3.2 Deterministic exports

Export is:

  • reproducible
  • versioned
  • tied to a specific SRS version

No more “which PDF did we send?“

4. Subtle but powerful UX ideas

4.1 Guided SRS creation

Wizard-like flow:

  • Scope → Stakeholders → Requirements → Data → Constraints
  • Prevents juniors from jumping straight to features

4.2 Contextual hints

Inline tips like:

“Non-functional requirements should be measurable.”

Not intrusive, just there.

5. Stack-aligned ideas (React / Next / Prisma / Postgres)

Backend / Data

  • Postgres JSONB for:
    • requirement metadata
    • diagram configs
  • Prisma schema → ERD auto-sync
  • Soft deletes + history tables for traceability

Frontend

  • Block-based editor (Notion-like, but constrained)
  • Mermaid rendered client-side with AST access
  • Graph view with something like d3 / reactflow

Optional modern spice

  • Local-first draft mode (IndexedDB)
  • CRDT-based collaboration (Yjs) later on
  • AI only for:
    • linting
    • ambiguity detection
    • change summaries (not generation)

6. Features I’d avoid (especially for juniors)

  • Full WYSIWYG chaos
  • AI “write the SRS for me”
  • Overly complex workflows
  • Too many diagram types initially

Simplicity + correctness > flexibility.

7. Positioning sentence (useful for focus)

“An SRS tool that teaches good requirements engineering while producing professional documentation.”

GlossaryDomain